| Citation |
Haszeldine, S., Chalmers, H., Gibbins, J., Markusson, N. and Skea, J. Response to the House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee inquiry on Carbon Capture and Storage. 2008. |
|---|
| Author(s) |
Haszeldine, S., Chalmers, H., Gibbins, J., Markusson, N. and Skea, J. |
|---|
| Download |
Response_to_the_House_of_Commons_Environmental_Audit_Committee_inquiry_on_Carbon_Capture_and_Storage.pdf  |
|---|
| Abstract |
- Carbon capture and storage (CCS) can be a critical CO2 reduction technology for the UK. CCS is now commencing the early pre-commercial demonstration stages worldwide, with the objective of widespread commercial deployment by 2020 - 2025.
- Capture ready design is a very important set of practical actions during the design and building of new power plant, which can be utilised at a later date, to enable the avoidance of locked-in high carbon emissions in future.
- BERR has already given Section 36 planning consent to Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC) power plants including a condition that they are capture ready, but without a clear definition of this condition.
- The Kingsnorth plant is currently awaiting a decision on capture ready requirements for coal-fired power plants in the UK. This has become a focus for objectors.
- A wideand encompassing specification of capture ready is needed, to ensure feasible conversion to CCS, when it is required by regulation and/or economically justified.
- It is very unlikely that a CCS plant will operate in the UK until additional costs are covered by appropriate financial support.
- Many estimates exist of the support needed to avoid losses on demonstration plant, typically stated to be a total of 70-100 per ton CO2. Several approaches are suggested here to regulate or incentivise CCS.
|
|---|
|
UKERC Publications 
