go to top scroll for more

Mineralisation - Carbon Capture & Storage by Mineralisation - Work Package 1: Stage Gate 2b Report; Synthesis and Interpretation

This resource links to a document we hold in our system

Abstract:

A series of experiments have been carried out to determine which types of ultramafic rocks are most suitable as a feed material for CCSM, using acid leach as the method to remove Mg cations from the rock to be available for carbonation. The results show that lizardite serpentinites are by far the best with olivine giving moderate results. Rocks rich in antigorite serpentine, pyroxene, and amphibole are not suitable. The ETI is grateful for the contributions made by all participants of the Mineralisation project; Perkins Engines Company Limited, Shell Global Solutions International B.V., Natural Environment Research Council as represented by the British Geological Survey, and the University of Nottingham.

Publication Year:

2012

Publisher:

ETI

Author(s):

Styles, M.T., Lacinska, A.M., Bide, T., Evans, E.J., Naden, J. and Wrighton, C.

Energy Category

Class Name:

Subclass Name:

Category Name:

Language:

English

File Type:

application/pdf

File Size:

8635209 B

Rights:

Energy Technologies Institute Open Licence for Materials

Rights Overview:

The Energy Technologies Institute is making this document available to use under the Energy Technologies Institute Open Licence for Materials. Please refer to the Energy Technologies Institute website for the terms and conditions of this licence. The Information is licensed "as is" and the Energy Technologies Institute excludes all representations, warranties, obligations and liabilities in relation to the Information to the maximum extent permitted by law. The Energy Technologies Institute is not liable for any errors or omissions in the Information and shall not be liable for any loss, injury or damage of any kind caused by its use. This exclusion of liability includes, but is not limited to, any direct, indirect, special, incidental, consequential, punitive, or exemplary damages in each case such as loss of revenue, data, anticipated profits, and lost business. The Energy Technologies Institute does not guarantee the continued supply of the Information. Notwithstanding any statement to the contrary contained on the face of this document, the Energy Technologies Institute confirms that it has the right to publish this document.

Further information:

N/A

Region:

United Kingdom

Publication Type:

Technical Report

Subject:

Technology

Theme(s):

Carbon Capture and Storage