go to top scroll for more

Techno-Economic Assessment of Biomass Pre-Processing (TEABPP) -Down-selection and workshop report

This resource links to a document we hold in our system

Abstract:

The techno-economic project will provide a greater understanding of the options available to modify or improve the physical and chemical characteristics of different types of UK-derived 2nd generation energy biomass feedstocks, that may otherwise reduce the cost-effective performance of conversion technologies

This report details the selection process for the modelling phase of the TEAB project, focusing on the downselecting of ten clearly defined case studies, from amongst the thousands of possible chain choices considered within the Deliverable 2 (D2) Excel tool. These 10 case studies are grouped in to twos or threes to compare the costs, efficiencies and GHG emissions of biomass supply chains “with” and “without” significant preprocessing. This Deliverable 3 (D3) report is a summary of the chain prioritisation process, containing:-

  • The agreedselection criteria used;
  • A write-up of the down-selection workshop discussions and decisions held;
  • The further data collected and improvements made to the D2 tool; and
  • Justification for the selection of the final 10 case studies– based on an assessment rating the chains against the selectioncriteria, highlighting particular strengths or weaknesses, and where particular criteria exclude groups of chains or chains containing particular components.
These 10 chains are the TEABPP project team’s recommendations for incorporation into the WP3 process modelling. The ordering is based on the order of discussion and justification above, and not based on a particular priority order.

  • Heat
    • Underfed combustion
      • Natural drying+ screening
      • Water washing
  • Power
    • BFB gasifier
      • Natural drying+ screening
      • Water wash + pelleting
    • CFB combustion
      • Natural drying+ screening
      • Pelleting
      • Chemical
      • wash + pelleting
    • EF gasifier + CCGT
      • Pelleting
      • Torrefaction+ pelleting
      • Pyrolysis

Publication Year:

2017

Publisher:

ETI

Author(s):

Taylor, R., Howes, J., Shah, N., Eastwood, M. and Hughes, K.

Language:

English

File Type:

application/pdf

File Size:

3701178 B

Rights:

Energy Technologies Institute Open Licence for Materials

Rights Overview:

The Energy Technologies Institute is making this document available to use under the Energy Technologies Institute Open Licence for Materials. Please refer to the Energy Technologies Institute website for the terms and conditions of this licence. The Information is licensed "as is" and the Energy Technologies Institute excludes all representations, warranties, obligations and liabilities in relation to the Information to the maximum extent permitted by law. The Energy Technologies Institute is not liable for any errors or omissions in the Information and shall not be liable for any loss, injury or damage of any kind caused by its use. This exclusion of liability includes, but is not limited to, any direct, indirect, special, incidental, consequential, punitive, or exemplary damages in each case such as loss of revenue, data, anticipated profits, and lost business. The Energy Technologies Institute does not guarantee the continued supply of the Information. Notwithstanding any statement to the contrary contained on the face of this document, the Energy Technologies Institute confirms that it has the right to publish this document.

Further information:

N/A

Region:

United Kingdom

Publication Type:

Technical Report

Theme(s):

Bioenergy