UKERC Energy Data Centre: ETI Publications

UKERC Home >> EDC Home >> ETI Publications >> Back to Results >> Bioenergy crops in the UK: Case studies on successful whole farm integration evidence pack

Bioenergy crops in the UK: Case studies on successful whole farm integration evidence pack


Citation Evans, H. Bioenergy crops in the UK: Case studies on successful whole farm integration evidence pack, ETI, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5286/UKERC.EDC.000890.
Cite this using DataCite
Author(s) Evans, H.
Project partner(s) ETI
Publisher ETI
DOI https://doi.org/10.5286/UKERC.EDC.000890
Download Bioenergy-crops-in-the-UK-evidence-pack.pdf document type
Abstract To understand more about how farmers have integrated 2G energy crops into their wider farm business, the ETI commissioned ADAS to carry out three case studies of successful transitions to 2G energy crops, examining the financial impact of the crop and understanding how farmers have optimised the way they use their land to minimise any impact on food production. This document provides the evidence behind each case study and details how the financial costs and benefits and food production changes were calculated. .
  • All three case studies demonstrate that planting energy crops can increase the profitability of the land over a 23-year lifetime. Initial investment costs are expected to be paid back within the first six to seven years.
  • When optimising the use of land across the farm, impacts on food production can be minimised or avoided. in two case studies, food impacts were minimised by using land which delivered poor arable yields, and by minimising the reduction in sheep numbers through higher stocking densities (the number of sheep per hectare). in the third case study, the crop was planted on unused land so no food production was displaced.
  • Land which is less suitable for food production or grazing can be suited to energy crops as they can be successfully planted on poorer quality soils, and land which is more prone to waterlogging or weed problems. They are also suited to less accessible fields as they require less intensive management than arable crops.
  • The farmers in these case studies chose to grow energy crops for a variety of reasons - making better use of difficult or underutilised land, diversifying income and reducing workload. In addition, all farmers cited the importance of obtaining secure fixed-term contracts with buyers in their decision making. This reinforces findings from previous ETI work on enabling UK biomass.
  • Discussions with land agents suggest that land used to grow biomass crops should not be valued differently to other agricultural land, as land should be valued on its productive capacity. however, the specific price offered by a buyer will be affected by their objectives in buying the land and their understanding of bioenergy crops. The presence of a profitable contract for the crop and a willingness from the buyer to continue with bioenergy cropping may have a beneficial impact on the land value. If the buyer wishes to change the land use, is uncertain how to manage a bioenergy crop, or if there are limited market outlets for the crop, the land value may be lower than if it weren’t planted with a bioenergy crop.
  • Qualitative evidence from the Miscanthus farmers indicate an increase in wildlife, particularly birds, since growing the crop. In the Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) Willow case study, the farm carried out an environmental impact assessment (EIA) before planting.
Associated Project(s) ETI-DE2001: Energy from Waste
Associated Dataset(s) No associated datasets
Associated Publication(s)

Advanced waste gasification, future strategies and potential outputs

Energy from Waste: Characterisation of UK Waste Streams and Assessment of Energy from Waste Technology Opportunities - Request for Proposal

Energy From Waste : Executive Summary

Energy From Waste : Executive Summary - WP1.3 - Final Waste Report

Energy From Waste : Executive Summary - WP2.2 - Technology Assessment

Energy From Waste : Executive Summary - WP3.3 - Technology System Improvement Opportunity Report

Energy From Waste : Executive Summary - WP4.2 - UK Benefits Case

Energy From Waste : Executive Summary - WP4.2 - UK Benefits Case - Compatibility with CCS

Energy From Waste : Project Overview

Energy From Waste : WP1.1 - Current Waste Data and Collection Plan Report

Energy From Waste : WP1.2 - Initial Waste Assessment

Energy From Waste : WP1.3 - Final Waste Assessment

Energy From Waste : WP2.2- Appendix B - Batch anaerobic digestion assay for food waste and paper and card as well as their mixtures

Energy From Waste : WP2.2 - Appendix C - Thermal Waste Material Conversion Technology Test Report Gasification and Pyrolysis

Energy From Waste : WP2.2 - Appendix D - Power Generation

Energy From Waste : WP2.2 - Technology Assessment Report

Energy From Waste : WP3.1 - Report on Selected and Validated Models

Energy From Waste : WP3.2 - System Model Development Report

Energy From Waste : WP3.3 - Technology System Improvement Opportunity Report

Energy From Waste : WP3.3 - Technology System Improvement Opportunity Report - Executive Summary

Energy From Waste : WP3 and WP4 - Key Legislation and Constraints for Energy from Waste Technologies

Energy From Waste : WP4.1 - Project Framework Deliverable

Energy From Waste : WP4.2 - UK Benefit Case Report - Syn Gas for Grid Injection

Energy From Waste : WP4.2 - UK Benefits Case - Appendices A and D-H to the main report (B1,2,and 3, and C are separate documents)

Energy From Waste : WP4.2 - UK Benefits Case - Appendix B1 - Energy from Waste Technology Landscape Review - Executive Summary

Energy From Waste : WP4.2 - UK Benefits Case - Appendix B2 - Energy from Waste Technology Landscape Review - Anaerobic Digestion

Energy From Waste : WP4.2 - UK Benefits Case - Appendix B3 - Energy from Waste Technology Landscape Review - Advanced Thermal Technologies

Energy From Waste : WP4.2 - UK Benefits Case - Appendix C - Pyrolysis and Gasification of Waste Review

Energy From Waste : WP4.2 - UK Benefits Case - A Review of Biomass to Liquid Fuels via Pyrolysis Oil

Energy From Waste : WP4.2 - UK Benefits Case - main report

Energy From Waste : WP4.2 - UK Benefits Case - Syn Gas for Fuels and Chemicals

Energy From Waste : WP4 -Initial financial model assumption list to promote discussion - Waste to Energy: High-level generic plant assumptions

ETI Insights Report - Bioenergy - Enabling UK biomass

ETI Insights Report - Insights into the future UK Bioenergy Sector, gained using the ETI’s Bioenergy Value Chain Model (BVCM)

Infographic - 10 years to prepare for a low carbon transition - Bioenergy

Infographic - Targeting new and cleaner uses for wastes and biomass using gasification

Overview of the ETI’s Bioenergy Value Chain Model (BVCM) Capabilities

Targeting new and cleaner uses for wastes and biomass using gasification

Targeting new and cleaner uses for wastes and biomass using gasification - Presentation

Waste gasification with syngas clean up ? reaching commercial demonstration and future prospects in the wider bioenergy sector - Presentation